The specialist recommendations and you can advice book writers in their behavior and make certain penned research is appropriate, rigid, and you may credible. Writers look for fellow reviewers primarily because of their within the-breadth experience in the subject number otherwise ways of the task he could be asked to evaluate. It solutions are priceless and you may irreplaceable. Peer writers is actually guilty of the precision and viewpoints shown into the the reports, and peer comment process operates to the a concept out of shared believe ranging from authors, reviewers and you will publishers. Despite fast improvements, generative AI systems possess significant constraints: they may be able lack up-to-date studies and will make absurd, biased or incorrect information. Manuscripts may also are delicate or proprietary pointers that ought to maybe not become common beyond your peer remark processes. Hence we inquire that, while you are Springer Character explores getting our very own peer reviewers having accessibility safe AI units, fellow reviewers do not upload manuscripts with the generative AI devices.
If any a portion of the review of the states built in brand new manuscript was a student in in any manner backed by an enthusiastic AI unit, i ask fellow writers in order to state the aid of particularly tools transparently from the peer comment statement.
Citations
Search posts and low-lookup posts (e.grams. Thoughts, Review, and you may Responses articles) need mention compatible and relevant literary works to get the newest states made. Excess notice-citation, coordinated operate one of multiple article writers to help you along self-mention, gratuitous and too many violation off posts composed on the diary to which the papers could have been filed, and every other variety of ticket control try inappropriate.
Violation manipulation can lead to this article becoming declined, that will feel advertised in order to authors’ associations. Similarly, people effort because of the fellow-reviewers or publishers in order to remind for example techniques would be advertised from the people towards publisher.
- Experts should consider the following guidelines while preparing the manuscript:
- One statement in the manuscript one to relies on additional sourced elements of suggestions (we.elizabeth. maybe not the new authors’ own brand new ideas or findings or standard studies) will be play with a pass.
- Authors is end pointing out derivations out of brand new functions. Particularly, they must cite the original works in place of an assessment article you to alludes to exclusive really works.
- Experts would be to guarantee that their citations was particular (i.e. they want to guarantee the ticket helps the new statement made in the manuscript and cannot misrepresent a special works from the citing it if the it will not secure the section brand new article authors desire to generate).
- People should not cite supplies they’ve maybe not read.
- Experts ought not to asian single solution mobile preferentially cite her otherwise their friends’, peers’, otherwise institution’s books.
- Experts is to prevent mentioning works solely from nation.
- Authors should avoid using an excessive amount of citations to help with one-point.
- If at all possible, experts is always to mention offer which have gone through fellow remark in which it is possible to.
- People must not cite adverts otherwise advertorial question.
Preprint discussing and you will citation
BMC publications prompt post away from preprints of first browse manuscripts to your preprint servers of one’s authors’ choices, authors’ or institutional websites, and you may discover interaction anywhere between scientists whether towards the community preprint servers or preprint commenting programs.
Preprints is actually identified as an author’s variety of a study manuscript in advance of specialized fellow review during the a log, that’s deposited for the a community servers (given that explained inside Preprints towards the life sciences. Science 352, 899901; 2016); preprints is generally published when inside peer comment techniques. Post away from preprints is not experienced earlier in the day guide and does not threaten consideration in the BMC guides. Manuscripts printed toward preprint server are not taken into consideration when choosing the improvement provided by a survey at issue within a beneficial BMC journal.
BMC enjoys married with Research Rectangular ( BMC possess a big part need for Search Square) to add Into the Feedback, a diary-included provider to possess preprint discussing, help writers across the all of the communities i are designed to express their lookup early. People distribution to a few BMC journals will be able to publicly display details about their peer opinion compliment of From inside the Review. General details about Inside Opinion at BMC together with Search Square preprint system is present right here that is where .